Rudy Giuliani Claims Black Poll Workers Who Received Death Threats After He Falsely Accused Them of Election Tampering Never Proved They Suffered ‘Emotional Harm’

Rudy Giuliani filed an appeal against the multi-million dollar verdict in a defamation case brought against him by two former Georgia election workers in which he disputed and undermined their emotional distress claims.

Giuliani was ordered to pay Ruby Freeman and her daughter, Shaye Moss, $148 million in damages for circulating false claims alleging they tampered with votes during the 2020 presidential election. The pair were met with numerous racist, violent and death threats during the time the lies were spread.

Bankrupted Rudy Giuliani Claims Donald Trump Owes Him $2 Million In Legal Fees As Former NYC Mayor Claims He's Scraping By
Rudy Giuliani speaks to members of the media where Republican candidate Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis was scheduled to host a campaign event on Jan. 21, 2024, in Manchester, New Hampshire. Gov. DeSantis has suspended his presidential campaign and is endorsing Republican candidate, former President Donald Trump. (Photo: Brandon Bell/Getty Images)

They sued Giuliani for $43 million for defamation in 2021, claiming that the former New York mayor intentionally inflicted emotional distress. Last December, a jury ruled that Giuliani must pay more than triple that amount to the mother-daughter duo. A day after the verdict came down, Giuliani filed for bankruptcy.

His attorneys filed an appeal on Tuesday that laid out several arguments to discredit Freeman’s and Moss’ emotional harm claims.

Giuliani claimed the pair played a “shell game” with the statute of limitations for filing defamation suits and that they “strategically cherry-picked” their emotional harm statements that would allow them to file a complaint after the filing deadline.

Freeman’s and Moss’ suit was filed on Dec. 23, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for D.C. where plaintiffs have one year from when a defamatory statement was made to file a complaint.

According to their complaint, Giuliani’s online defamatory campaign against the pair started on December 27, 2020, when he started executing a strategic messaging scheme purporting that the 2020 election was stolen and accused them by name of voter fraud.

Giuliani’s appeal also argued that Freeman and Moss never proved at trial that they suffered emotional distress and undercutted the expert witness testimony given by Northwestern University professor Ashlee Humphreys, who testified in court that Giuliani’s defamatory statements had a “significant, negative, and long-lasting impact on the reputations” of Freeman and Moss.

Giuliani wants a court to grant him a new trial or reassess the damages he owes Freeman and Moss. A bankruptcy judge allowed him to appeal the verdict on the condition that he use pre-approved donors to pay any further legal expenses.

Giuliani isn’t only indebted to the former poll workers. He also owes Hunter Biden, son of President Joe Biden, who sued the ex-Trump attorney for violating his privacy over data allegedly taken from his laptop, as well as lawyers who represented him in past cases and haven’t been paid their legal bills.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top