‘Y’all Trying to Make It So Nobody Don’t Like Her’: Tami Roman Opens Up About Her Past Experience on ‘Basketball Wives’ and How Producers Treated OG Chijindu on Set  

In the past, former “Basketball Wives” star Ogom “O.G.” Chijindu has been vocal about how other castmates and production treated her while filming the reality show. Chijindu starred in the hit VH1 series for two seasons.

Chijindu claimed that during her time there, she was characterized as aggressive because of the complexion of her skin. Chijindu also accused Evelyn Lozada of being a colorist, following the 46-year-old’s remarks and actions during the pair’s explosive arguments and social media spats.

On Oct. 1, former “BBW” star Tami Roman confirmed those allegations during an interview with the “Basketball Wives Club” podcast. In the discussion, Roman shared that Chijindu was being ridiculed over her appearance by the show’s producers.

The 52-year-old said, “When they were putting O.G. through the casting process, one of the producers came up to me and said, ‘She’s ugly and doesn’t dress well. Wait ’til you get inside and see what she has on.’ And the first thing that came to my mind was that’s exactly how the f–k y’all did me! This is some bulls–t.”

Roman continued the conversation by saying that she felt the producers purposely criticized Chijindu to make her unlikable to the other cast.

Roman said, “OG’s mad cool and I’m glad we are friends, but I don’t necessarily know that I would have been as concerned with being her friend had they not said that. You understand what I’m saying. It’s like y’all are trying to make it so that nobody don’t like her and that’s not cool ’cause that’s exactly what y’all did to me.”

Further into the discussion, Roman, who is still good friends with Chijindu, shared the reason why she couldn’t defend or be an alliance for the former Legends Football League player during their time together on season seven of “BBW” was because she completely “checked out.”

“By the time O.G. came on board I was checked out so I wasn’t really as much of an alliance as she may have needed to stay in that situation because no one was willing to fight for her. I’ve always been a person that like right is right and wrong is wrong.”

While discussing the treatment Chijindu reportedly endured, Roman added, “Everything that they did to OG was wrong. Like I saw it with my own eyes. It’s not something that she’s fabricating, it’s not like she’s making up stuff. It was wrong how they treated that girl and how they did that girl legitimately and that is the honest-to-God truth. So by the time I left it was her against the world.”

Toward the end of the interview, Roman shared that the other women would not have liked Chijindu because they would have felt inadequate around her due to her various characteristics. The mother of two described Chijindu as a person who doesn’t back down and has a clear point of view and sense of self.

Roman followed up those comments by telling the hosts that Chijindu was entertaining to watch on television, despite allegedly not being offered an opportunity to return to “BBW” for season nine.

Chijindu has yet to respond to Roman’s comments.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top