‘A Meritless Shakedown’: Diddy Responds to Lawsuit Filed By Woman Claiming to be Kim Porter’s Niece

Sean “Diddy” Combs believes he’s in the middle of a “shakedown” after being sued by a woman claiming to be Kim Porter‘s niece. The woman referred to as Jane Doe in court documents obtained by TMZ alleges she was wrongfully terminated after telling the Bad Boy founder she was pregnant.

Jane was hired as a full-time nanny to look after Diddy and Kim’s twins, Jessie James and D’Lila. She said she “was responsible for the twins’ 24/7 care.” She explained that she moved into the family estate the day after Porter passed away on Nov. 15, 2018.

But in August 2020, Jane revealed she was pregnant, which “infuriated” Diddy. She claims she was fired by Diddy’s reps around the time she was to begin maternity leave.

She claims reps felt being pregnant and unmarried “purportedly set a bad example” for his teenage daughters.

Diddy also has a 16-year-old daughter, Chance, from another relationship.

A spokesperson on behalf of the music mogul addresses the case in a statement shared with the outlet. “This lawsuit is a meritless shakedown to extort money from Mr Combs. Raven is not the niece of Kim Porter as she falsely alleges; nor is there any legal basis for this case to be filed under the anonymity as a ”Jane Doe,” they told TMZ. “Raven was a part-time babysitter to the twins who Mr. Combs kept on the job back in 2018 to provide continuity for the twins following the untimely death of their mother. Mr. Combs graciously permitted Raven to live in his home with her son and treated them like ‘family.'”

The rep claims the woman’s babysitting services were “always intended to be temporary.”

“In fact, Raven’s transition out of her role was planned and agreed to by her long before she even mentioned that she was pregnant,” they continued. “Mr. Combs will take swift and immediate action to protect his family against these false claims.”

Another source close to the 52-year-old also confirmed that the woman is not related to Kim or Diddy.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top