‘Shark Tank’ Star Daymond John Apologizes After Receiving Backlash For Praising Minister Louis Farrakhan In Now-Deleted Tweet

Business mogul Daymond John is under fire after praising a speech given by Minister Louis Farrakhan this past weekend at rapper DMX’s funeral.

“What a powerful speech from Minister Louis Farrakhan for the #dmxfuneral,” the “Shark Tank” star wrote in a now-deleted Twitter post. “His deep understanding of the Bible and respect for other people’s religions was truly inspiring. #RIPDMX.”

NEW YORK, NEW YORK – MARCH 10: Daymond John visits Build to discuss his book Powershift at Build Studio on March 10, 2020 in New York City. (Photo by Michael Loccisano/Getty Images)

John garnered backlash almost instantly after many people brought up the Nation of Islam leader’s past. Over the decades, Farrakhan has repeatedly been accused of making what some perceive to be anti-Semitic statements, such as calling Jewish people “termites.” 

John apologized for his post shortly after in a lengthy statement, writing, “In regards to my tweet regarding DMXs funeral, my comments on Minister Farrakhan were only related to what I just witnessed tonight, unbeknownst to his prior stances.” He added, “As someone who was fortunate enough to have a step dad of the Jewish faith, I do not condone and never would condone any anti Semitic, prejudice or any remarks of hatred. The prior tweet will be removed to avoid further pain and confusion to anyone who has felt hurt in the past by any negative comments of his.”

Actor Nick Cannon faced a similar situation last summer after making what some believed were anti-Semitic remarks on his podcast “Cannon’s Class” during an interview with former Public Enemy member Richard “Professor Griff” Griffin. The 40-year-old Cannon was fired by ViacomCBS from his show “Wild ‘N Out” and apologized for his statements, even appearing on the American Jewish Committee’s online program “AJC Advocacy Anywhere” with AJC’s Director of Interreligious and Intergroup Relations Rabbi Noam Marans to discuss his identity and the relationship between Black and Jewish cultures.

However, during the conversation with Marans, when asked to denounce Farrakhan, whom Cannon had referenced during his podcast, he refused. 

Seemingly speaking cautiously, Cannon prefaced his reply with a Hebrew phrase which translates to “If I’m not for myself, then who will be for me?” He continued, “I preface with that because, in the Black community, we often feel we have no one that is for us, and the people who do step for us are instantly condemned.”

The “Love Don’t Cost a Thing” star then claimed to Marans that several Black leaders have been called anti-Semitic, including “Muhammad Ali, Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, James Baldwin, the list goes on. … Martin Luther King, at one point, was called the most dangerous human being by America or in the nation and was deemed a terrorist. So when you see someone like Minister Farrakhan, to our community, he has been a leader.”

Marans responded to Cannon’s statements saying that while he appreciated his honesty, his response, however, remained “not fully satisfactory.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top