‘#BloombergIsRacist…Always Has Been’: Resurfaced Audio Reminds Folks of Mike Bloomberg’s Thoughts on Stop-And-Frisk

Former New York mayor and current U.S. presidential candidate Mike Bloomberg is being dragged after audio of him profiling people of color as criminals resurfaced on social media. The resurfaced audio sparked outrage and #BloombergIsRacist began trending on Twitter.

Bloomberg made the inflammatory comments about “stop-and-frisk” during a speech to the Aspen Institute in February 2015, according to The New York Post. The policy allowed police officers to stop citizens on the street if they believed there was probable cause for a search.

“Ninety-five percent of murders, murderers and murder victims fit one M.O. You can just take a description, Xerox it, and pass it out to all the cops,” Bloomberg said. “They are male, minorities, 16 to 25. That’s true in New York, that’s true in virtually every city. And that’s where the real crime is. You’ve got to get the guns out of the hands of people that are getting killed.”

The former mayor also justified placing more police officers in minority neighborhoods “because that’s where all the crime is.” He also credited “stop-and-frisk” for getting guns off the streets.

“And the way you get the guns out of the kids’ hands is to throw them up against the wall and frisk them,” Bloomberg continued. “And then they start … ‘Oh, I don’t want to get caught,’ so they don’t bring the gun. They still have a gun, but they leave it at home.”

Mike Bloomberg
Mike Bloomberg is embroiled in controversy after audio of racist comments resurfaces. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

Shortly after the speech, Bloomberg’s team tried to block the audio from being released by Aspen Institute, as reported by Aspen Times.

News regarding Bloomberg brought on the hashtag and a flurry of public comments. “Wake up and see #BloombergIsRacist trending. Thank goodness people on Twitter are not as dumb as the supposly smart people on CNN & MSNBC,” wrote one critic. “By the way, Bloomberg is a sophisticated/well spoken version of Trump. They are freaking the same!”

“Jesus Christ! Of course #BloombergIsRacist.  Always has been, so why is this trending now?” wrote another.

“Billions of dollars and he still can’t have common sense or decency,” said another. “Is it really shocking that this Oligarch is racist and sexist.”

Several users reposted a video an interview Bloomberg did in 2013. Once again, he defended “stop-and-frisk” and refuted the media’s argument against the policy.

“One newspaper and one news service, they just keep saying ‘oh it’s a disproportionate percentage of a particular ethnic group.’ That may be, but it’s not a disproportionate percentage of those who witnesses and victims describe as committing the [crime],” he stated.

Bloomberg added, “In that case, incidentally, I think we disproportionately stop whites too much and minorities too little. It’s exactly the reverse of what they’re saying.”

In 2009, Black and Latinx people were nine times more likely to be stopped than white people, according to The New York Times. A couple years later, in 2011, Black and Latinx people made up 87 percent of stops.

The billionaire tried to repair his image before he announced his plan to run for president on Nov. 24. A week before the announcement, he apologized for the policy in front of a congregation at a predominately Black church.

“I now see that we could and should have acted sooner, and acted faster, to cut the stops,” he said. “I wish we had, and I’m sorry that we didn’t. However, today I want you to know that I realized back then that I was wrong and I’m sorry.”

It remains to be seen how this will affect his already testy relationship with Black voters. On Monday, Quinnipiac University released a poll placing Bloomberg in second place among Black voters. However, the sample size only consisted of 665 Democrats and left-leaning independents.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top