Kawhi Leonard Countersued by Nike in Battle Over Logo

Kawhi Leonard has just been countersued by Nike after the NBA player filed a lawsuit over a logo last month.

Leonard — who joined the Los Angeles Clippers as a free agent last month after leading the Toronto Raptors to the NBA championship title — had a deal with Nike that lasted from 2011-2018, and during that time Nike said they came up with different versions of the logo that is modeled on his handprint and submitted them to the superstar small forward. Nike also said they created the final version that was used on merchandise.

But Leonard said he came up with the logo in 2011 while sketching as a student at San Diego State University, which Nike admits he sent them. Leonard’s original image has his K.L. initials mixed with the No. 2 he wears and it’s in the form of a hand.

After the L.A. native and Nike’s deal was completed, he continued to use the logo and received a cease-and-desist order in 2018 because the company said they owned it.

Leonard also filed a trademark application, which Nike found out about, and according to TMZ they said he “fraudulently claimed to be the author and sole owner of the Claw Design.”

Leonard, however, said he’s the actual creator and should be able to use the logo on anything he wants. But Nike — who also filed for their own trademark — said the image they made is different from the hoop player’s and it’s something he signed off on.

Nike even said Leonard admitted publicly the company should be given “all the credit” for turning his “rough draft” into the final version.

The company now wants a judge to order Leonard to not use the logo and they’re suing him for fraud, breach of contract, as well as copyright infringement.

Nike also wants to be compensated monetarily, although a dollar amount wasn’t mentioned.

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top