Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren Support Reparations for Black Americans Impacted by Legacy of Slavery

Democratic presidential hopefuls Sens. Kamala Harris of California and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts have both said recently that they support the idea of reparations for Black Americans impacted by the legacy of slavery.

Harris, who announced her bid for president last month, discussed the issue on New York radio show “The Breakfast Club,” where she agreed with hosts that reparations and race-conscious policy are needed to begin addressing problems of “inequities” and discrimination in America.

“We have to be honest that people in this country do not start from the same place or have access to the same opportunities,” Harris said in a statement to The New York Times on Thursday, doubling down on her remarks. “I’m serious about taking an approach that would change policies and structures and make real investments in Black communities.”

Warren has also voiced her support for reparations.

“We must confront the dark history of slavery and government-sanctioned discrimination in this country that has had many consequences including undermining the ability of Black families to build wealth in America for generations,” Warren said Thursday in a statement.

She added: “Black families have had a much steeper hill to climb — and we need systemic, structural changes to address that.”

As reported by Fox News, reparations would involve the federal government’s acknowledgement of the ongoing legacy of slavery and race-based discrimination, and provide compensation to those affected by it. Policy experts estimate such a move could cost trillions of dollars. The United States Gross National Product, a measure of all the goods and services produced by American residents and companies, is approximately $19.4 trillion.

Not everyone has been on board with it. Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) totally dismissed the idea in 2016, saying reparations would be “divisive.” Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and President Barack Obama have also had reservations on the issue.

Other prominent Democrats have offered alternative solutions to address America’s issues of social and racial inequality. Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey, who’s also running for president, has proposed helping children from low-income families with a so-called “baby bonds policy,” which would provide them with government-funded savings accounts that rise to as much as $50,000 for the lowest income brackets, The New York Times reported.

Meanwhile, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand of New York has thrown her support behind a proposal that would allow Americans who don’t have checking accounts to bank at their local post office. The newspaper noted that the bulk of America’s unbanked population are people of color.

There’s still much political risk associated with supporting reparations, however, and a 2014 poll showed there’s still much opposition to the idea.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top