50 Cent Gets Roasted for Bragging About His Youngest Son but Beefing With Oldest: ‘That Picture Don’t Mean Sh–‘

50 Cent often likes to post photos of his youngest son Sire Jackson. Plus, he often gushes about how much he admires him and enjoys his personality. But when it comes to his other son, Marquise Jackson, Fif only talks about him negatively, and it’s something his fans recently brought up.

On Saturday, Jan. 19, the New York rapper shared a new photo of Sire and wrote about how proud he is of him.

50 Cent got blasted for posting a photo of his youngest son while still fighting with his oldest son Marquise Jackson.

Instagram

“You know this is my main man, Sire,” wrote Fif. “He is a better version of me.”

There were plenty of comments about the boy being “handsome” and how big he’s gotten, but others brought up Marquise. Some gave 50 some friendly advice about patching things up with the 21-year-old, while others blasted him for not doing so already.

“That picture don’t mean sh– without the other son, clown,” someone wrote.

“What about your other son?” wrote another.

“Until he gets older and out of pocket and you cut him off too,” a third person predicted about Sire. “Sh– is sad, man. We only get one shot on this earth and at the end of the day, our kids are our legacy to nourish, by any means necessary. Praying that you two find a way to come together and iron out your differences because life is too short.”

But some came to the G-Unit boss’ defense and said he took care of Marquise when he was little, so he doesn’t deserve the backlash over their strained relationship.

“You must not be a real fan, ’cause he even set up a million dollar fund for his kid,” someone wrote.

50 once acknowledged that he gave his son a lump sum of money, but there’s no confirmation that it was $1 million.

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top