Activist Tamika Mallory Unfazed As Meghan McCain Tries Desperately to Rattle Her Over Minister Louis Farrakhan

Things got heated on “The View” on Monday as co-host Meghan McCain grilled Women’s March co-president Tamika D. Mallory over her spirited support for controversial Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan and her refusal to condemn some of his rhetoric.

Mallory, who’s taken heat for her association with Farrakhan in the past, and three other co-chairs were asked to resign from their posts late last year for allowing “anti-Semitic … and hateful, racist rhetoric” to tarnish the organization’s platform.

Co-host Sunny Hostin pointed specifically to Farrakhan’s reputation for making disparaging remarks about Jewish people and asked Mallory, who’s called the minister “the greatest of all time,” if she understood why the association was so problematic.

“Just because you go into a space with someone does not mean you agree with everything they say,” Mallory said before adding, “I didn’t call him the greatest of all time because of his rhetoric — I called him the greatest of all time because of what he has done in Black communities.”

The feminist organizer explained that her activism sometimes puts her in “difficult” spaces, including the Women’s March, where she said some activists didn’t understand why issues of race were important when discussing women’s rights. McCain wasn’t satisfied by the answer, however, and continued to press Mallory on the issue.

“I would never be comfortable supporting someone who [said] ‘I am not anti-Semite, I am an anti-termite. It is the wicked Jews, the false Jews promoting lesbianism, homosexuality …’ ” said McCain, citing an investigative report by Jewish publication Tablet Magazine. The report included several allegations of anti-Semitism involving Mallory, who McCain accused of using her feminist activism to mask her own bias against Jews.

Women’s March co-president Bob Bland denied the allegations, but McCain refused to let up on her interrogation of Mallory.

“I don’t speak for Jewish people but I think I’m just confused,” she continued,  rattling off quotes from Farrakhan. “These remarks are — I mean, it goes on, ‘death to Israel’ over and over again.”

“We didn’t make those remarks,” Mallory explained.

“But you’re associating with a man that does,” McCain said, cutting her off.

“What I will say to you is that I don’t agree with many of Minister Farrakhan’s statements,” Mallory responded.

McCain remained persistent, asking the feminist organizer if she’d condemn Farrakhan’s statements against Jewish people specifically. Mallory wouldn’t budge.

“You won’t condemn it,” McCain said, smirking in disbelief.

Mallory finally responded: “To be clear, it’s not the way that I speak, it is not how I organize. I think it’s very clear over the 20 years of my own personal activism, my own personal track record who I am and that I should never be judged through the lens of a man.”

Watch more in the clip below.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top