Gilbert Arenas Awarded Money From Woman Who Falsely Accused Him of Harassing Her With a Sex Tape

Sometimes false accusers get away with their wrongdoing and sometimes they don’t. In Gilbert Arenas‘ case the latter occurred.

In June of this year, Arenas was hit with a restraining order by a woman named Janelle Reeves, who accused him of harassing her with a sex tape that he threatened to release to her 10-year-old son. Reeves said she was involved with the former NBA player for two years, and when they parted ways he sought revenge.

Gilbert Arenas awarded money from woman who falsely accused him of harassment

YouTube

“He said he was waiting to get my son’s cell phone number from his son so that he could send my child naked photos of me and video of Arenas and I having sex and video of me naked,” she alleged.

Reeves also said she once gave into Arenas’s sexual demands out of fear when he banged on the door and entered her home.

But from the very beginning, Arenas accused Reeves of lying and he sued her for defamation, plus, 10 million because he lost his job at Yahoo Sports due to the accusation.

The case was thrown out earlier this month, and now Reeves has to pay up, according to Arenas’ attorney David Bass.

“[Reeves] resolved the dispute by paying Mr. Arenas an undisclosed amount for his damages and confirming that the restraining order action of June 2018 was meritless, filed with fabricated documents and therefore, filed without cause,” Bass told TMZ Sports

At this time, there’s no word on how much Reeves had to pay, and Arenas hasn’t confirmed the amount either, not on social media or anywhere else.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top