Sanaa Lathan Claims She Was Treated Horribly in Hollywood by ‘Actresses You May Know’

Actress Sanaa Lathan recently spoke up about what she claims were her unpleasant experiences and moments with Hollywood A-list actresses who treated her unkindly.

During a press tour in New York for her Netflix film “Nappily Ever After,” Lathan discussed the ill treatment she received from several Hollywood women in the entertainment business.

“Just coming up in the business, I have been treated just horribly by some women that you may know,” the 47-year-old said last week in New York at the premiere of her New film.

“I won’t call any names. But when you’re working with somebody who’s maybe a little older than you — now I’m the older one — you don’t expect to get competition, and jealousy, and weird vibes on set. And I was very hurt, very early on in my career by a couple of different women.”

Lathan has been in the entertainment business for more than 20 years and first appeared on television in 1995 on shows “In the House” and “Moesha.”

The actress received major backlash after comedian Tiffany Haddish confirmed in June that it was Lathan who allegedly bit Beyoncé at a party. The “Love and Basketball” actress rebutted the rumors during an interview with “The Talk” in July.

“Me and my friends, we laughed our a**es off. We thought it was funny. I mean, it was so absurd,” said Lathan. Earlier, when the rumor first broke, she had taken to Twitter and written, “Y’all are funny. Under no circumstances did I bite Beyonce and if I did it would’ve been a love bite 💋.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top