Foxy Brown Fires Back at Designer LaQuan Smith’s Claim She Skipped Out on Runway Gig

Foxy Brown has been accused by fashion designer LaQuan Smith of skipping out on her New York Fashion Week performance, but Brown believes otherwise.

Smith alleged the the female rapper refused to perform at his VIP New York Fashion Week Party but ran off with the money that he paid her.

Last week Brown took to her Instagram to share her side of the story. In the post she addressed Smith and said, “LIES💋 @laquan_smith Messy AF! I’m appalled even addressing this fictitious, “FASHION WEEK FAIRYTALE” you’ve concocted to the media!” She continued and said, “As our upper echelon, BLACK SUPER HERO OF FASHION, I’m embarrassed for YOU.knowing, after literally begging us to perform; (you’d deliberately orchestrate erroneous bullshit), in a scandalous attempt to bring discord into MY INCREDIBLE COMEBACK!” She ended her lengthy caption by saying she’s ready to get into legal war with the designer, “I’ve allowed you to bask & twirl, in this fraudulent press. Purposely silenced, as we meticulously prepare for FIERCE LITIGATION!”

Foxy Brown Foxy Brown

On Sunday, Brown offered what she claimed is proof that she did attempt to perform at the party but Smith’s team gave her boots that are to be worn on the same foot. She shared the image to her Instagram and said, “The INFAMOUS “2 LEFT BOOTS” We were given by @laquan_smith’s people!💋” She also said that she never received any payments to run off with, “AND, your BACK END funds never left your account BELOVED. LIES!💋”

Foxy Brown

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top