Maria Sharapova’s Early Loss at Wimbledon Has Some Wondering If Doping Was Factor In Previous Wins 

maria sharapova

(Photo by DANIEL LEAL-OLIVAS/AFP/Getty Images)

Serena Williams may be the target of excessive drug testing but some speculate Maria Sharapova’s past doping made a difference in her own play after she lost her first round at Wimbledon Tuesday.

Sharapova gave up a 5-2 lead and fell 6-7 (3), 7-6 (3), 6-4 to fellow Russian player Vitalia Diatchenko July 3, the AFP reported. The loss was unexpected as Diatchenko is ranked 132 in the world and troubled by injuries.

“Sometimes, you put yourself in a better, or winning, position, and you don’t finish,” Sharapova, who said the transition from clay to grass courts has been harder as she got older, told the Associated Press.

When asked if her issue came down to pre-match jitters, the 24 ranked player said, “That’s part of the game, is to feel moments of tension, to feel there’s something on the line. That’s just human. No matter how many times you’ve done it, no matter what court you’re playing on — Centre Court, backcourt — just the moment, the crowd  — Wimbledon, another tournament — you always want to do your best.

“Of course, you feel it. But I love that feeling. That’s one of the reasons I play. I definitely, maybe, wasn’t smart enough, didn’t play the right way in the crucial moments.”

Sharapova was banned from tennis for 15-months after testing positive for meldonium, which she claimed she used before learning the World Anti-Doping Agency added it to its list of banned drugs at the top of 2016. Sharapova said at the time she used the drug to treat diabetes because of her family’s history with the disease and other ailments. However, it was discovered the drug also enhances athletic performance by increasing blood flow.

As such, some have wondered if Sharapova needs to rely on doping to perform well.

“Without the doping, she has been average. The years of doping has caught up with her. Dope-A-Pova is finished. Plus the talent pool has surpassed her.”

“What’s wrong, Maria? Can’t win without meldonium?”

“Not as good without the drugs, this is why she took them in the first place, they made an average pro a really good one… now she is average again!”

“Nope, you’re done. No drugs to help you. RIP.”

Upon Sharapova’s banning, Williams became the top-earning tennis star in the world, however, she’s recently been the target of over-testing. A Deadspin report said a U.S. Anti-Doping Agency officer arrived at Williams’ home unannounced last month and waited for her to arrive to administer the test. The test wasn’t given, but the USADA database shows Williams has been tested five times this year alone — more than any other top-ranked women’s tennis player.

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top