Jury Finds Second White Nationalist Guilty In Brutal Beating of Black Man at Charlottesville Rally

WVIR NBC29 Charlottesville News, Sports, and Weather

A second white nationalist has been found guilty in the brutal garage beating of a Black man at the “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Va. last summer.

A jury took roughly 30 minutes on Thursday to find Alex Michael Jones guilty of “malicious wounding” in the August 12, attack where he and a group of other men viciously beat 20-year-old Deandre Harris. The attack left Harris with a concussion, abrasions and a gash on his head that required staples.

The verdict against Jones comes just two days after fellow alleged white nationalist Jacob Goodwin was found guilty in the same attack. Goodwin is expected to be sentenced April 23, local station NBC 29 reported.

Three other men are also facing pending trials in the group assault on Harris. At one point, Harris was even charged in his own beating after a white nationalist convinced a magistrate that Harris struck him with a flashlight in a separate incident at the rally. The charges were later dropped, however.

As for Ramos, he faces five to 20 years behind bars for his role in the assault.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top