Steve Harvey Comes to Wife’s Defense After Fans Drag Her for Using Offensive Word

Steve Harvey Clapback

Critics blasted Marjorie Harvey over her casual use of the word “retarded.” instagram/Video screenshot)

Comedian Steve Harvey came out swinging after critics attacked his wife, Marjorie Harvey, over an Instagram post where she used the word “retarded” to poke fun at herself.

“I’m sitting here arguing with my husband ‘cuz clearly he thinks I’m retarded because I can’t cut a beet,” Marjorie says in the short clip as she and Steve prepare to make fresh pressed juice.

https://www.instagram.com/p/Bg_psu7l68a/?utm_source=ig_embed

Some folks didn’t take too kindly to the post and highlighted how casual use of the term is insensitive to those who are or know someone who’s actually mentally retarded.

“It’s an issue because retarded is a word used to mock those with mental retardation,” one user wrote. “You don’t have to call a being who had disabilities retarded in order for it to be offensive — just like a white person doesn’t have to call a Back person a nigger in order for it to be offensive.”

“Just lost all respect for you,” wrote another. “So beyond disappointed by your choice of words and your thinking upon this situation that you choose this word. Pure ignorance.”

The harsh comments and criticism were enough for Steve to come to his wife’s defense.

“What you trippin’ bout?” he commented, blasting fans for being upset over nothing. “Cause my wife used the word retarded? It’s a word ain’t it?”

“I don’t ever comment but [damn], is you just looking for something to be pissed off about, cuz we ain’t,” he added.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top