K. Michelle’s Appearance Has Some Fans Scratching Their Heads

https://www.instagram.com/p/BgfGS0pgFIE/?utm_source=ig_embed

Singer K. Michelle has a new look — and it’s not her more natural rear end.

The reality starlet, who recently documented the removal of her illegal butt injections on “The Dr. Oz Show,” posted a video on Instagram, Sunday, March 18 soundtracked to Biggie’s “Hypnotize” where she looked lighter and a lot more fresh-faced than usual.

Michelle had been on hiatus from social media of sorts late last year before undergoing a procedure to get her derrière back to a more natural size. But she’s been back online since January.

“Edible Cruising. Y’all I’ve really enjoyed my weekend,” Michelle said before crediting her look to a new skincare regimen. “I never get to let go and just glow! Skin Regiment from @drjasondiamond check him out. I do micro needling and PRP. My skin is amazing❤.”

While several people remarked on her makeup-free appearance, others were stuck on the fact that she doesn’t quite look like herself.

“Wait why she look so different?” someone commented.

“You look different 😳😱,” said another.

A separate person didn’t even think it was “Who is this though? Is this K. Michelle really?”

“She got her nose and cheekbones done,” someone speculated.

“Looks like a white woman now🤷🏾‍♀️,” another said. “Well, I guess that was her goal smh 🤦🏽‍♀️.”

“Who dis woman, harpo?,” another person joked.

Still, Michelle had some support.

“#BLACKDONTCRACK 😘😍 yo skin beautiful if they don’t like it obviously they gotta be hating and hating on a millionaire never brought me money #💓,” someone said.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top