Snapchat Goes Too Far With Rihanna and Chris Brown Ad

Screenshot of Snapchat offensive ad taken from the Twitter account

Snapchat is a very popular social media app that often posts relatable content and hilarious advertising. This time the apps attempt to be funny went too far when it made a domestic abuse post referencing pop icon Rihanna.

The ad made light of the domestic abuse incident that happened between Rihanna and Chris Brown back in 2009 when they were dating. The advertisement said, “Would you rather slap Rihanna, punch Chris Brown.” The extremely tasteless ad while only up for a couple minutes then taken down has been shared to other social media outlets by snap chat users.

After receiving backlash from fans, the social media app released an apology. “The advert was reviewed and approved in error, as it violates our advertising guidelines. We immediately removed the ad last weekend, once we became aware. We are sorry that this happened.”

Snapchat has apparently been on a decline for some time. Since the snapshot update last month, many users have complained.

Rihanna fans are still disgruntled by the ad.

https://twitter.com/phlygerl/status/973352175672942592

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top