Shaquille O’Neal Shares Solution to Gun Violence, and it Doesn’t Involve Arming Teachers

 

NBA Hall of Famer Shaquille O’Neal has a solution to gun violence in schools — and it doesn’t involve arming teachers like President Donald Trump espoused.

Yet that doesn’t mean he’s in favor of banning guns altogether. In fact, he said that would only create more problems.

“The only problem with that is, there’s 15 million of ’em out there already on the streets,” he tells 77 WABC’s “Curtis + Cosby” Wednesday, March 14. “And then another problem is if you ban ’em, then you gonna create an underground market, and the gun collectors, you know, it’s gonna become more valuable.

“I just think — I think the quick fix now [is] the government should give law enforcement more money,” the Fort Lauderdale resident who lives nearby the Parkland, Fla. school where 17 were killed a month ago continues. “Give more money, you recruit more people and the guys that are not ready to go on the streets, you put them in front of the schools.”

O’Neil, who is a reserve officer in South Florida, added guns would “become a collectors’ item” with prices more than doubling once they’re sold underground.

He also said that as someone who grew up on a military base with a police presence, “there weren’t many 3 p.m. fights,” lending credit to his solution for school shootings.

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top