Trevor Noah Slams Trump’s Theory That Gun Violence is Caused By Violent Video Games

President Trump recently had a roundtable discussion about video games having a deadly influence on gun violence and Trevor Noah seems to vastly disagree.

The conversation follows the mass shooting of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida.

Trump said, “The video games, the movies, the internet stuff is so violent. It’s so incredible. I see it… And this is what kids are watching. And I think you maybe have to take a look at it.”

Noah couldn’t disagree more with the president and opposed the idea of video games being the only factor leading to gun violence.

“Here’s what I don’t get about this argument: How come video games are supposedly so influential but only when it comes to guns?… Because I mean, if they really were as influential as politicians say, then shouldn’t games influence us with everything?,” the “Daily Show” talk host asked.

Noah continued, “There have been hundreds of studies on this issue, and they have shown that there isn’t any connection between violent video games and violent activities. Now, that doesn’t mean that video games have no influence on you, because let’s be honest, everything we consume as human beings affects us somehow… So yes, I agree that video games can affect your behavior, but so can TV and movies and, hell, there’s even violence in the Bible.”

The host concluded with suggesting how to “limit the tools that violent people have” and added that Japan has some of the strictest gun laws across the world with only one gun murder out of 127 million people.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top