Fans Are Outraged at Raphael Saddiq After Praising Justin Timberlake for Singing Black Music

justin timberlake

Raphael Saadiq had nothing but praise for Justin Timberlake. (Photo by Daniel Boczarski/Redferns/Kevin Mazur/WireImage)

R&B singer-producer Raphael Saadiq found himself in hot water Saturday, Feb. 17 when he shared an Instagram post in praise of Justin Timberlake.

“He knows his music, crafty Timberlake. Dude sings more Black music than most, sad but true. At least he’s dope and super talented,” he wrote before crediting producers of JT’s new album, Pharrell and Timbaland.

As Timberlake has been accused of capitalizing off Black music with his hip-hop-driven beats, Saadique’s take on the “Man of the Woods” album maker wasn’t well received.

justin timberlake

“You gotta be s—ting me with this!” someone exclaimed. “Dude, what happened to you?”

“Did we forget his ‘All [Lives] Matter‘ comments?!” another said. “I don’t care what music he sings, he doesn’t respect the culture and [people] his stolen music comes from. You can’t have it both ways. Remember that.”

“He’s a watered-down Usher,” said another. “Bye.”

Still, Saadiq managed to wrangle a few supporters.

“Agreed!!!!” someone said. “Justin respects Black music and pays homage to it. And I can respect that.”

“Love his music very talented,” someone else said.

Yet several more slammed the Solange producer’s praise of Timberlake.

“This was the dumbest thing I heard today,” someone said. “And during Black History Month!? Wtf.”

“The Promotion of WHITE Appropriation and the theft of OUR Culture?” another commented. “You support this….Bruno Should’ve been the Super Bowl halftime.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top