Stay Connected
Atlanta Black Star/Culture
CultureEditor's PicksEntertainmentRace

Justin Timberlake Completely Misses the Point of Jesse Williams’ Fiery Speech and Gets Roasted on Twitter 

Posted byBy Kiersten Willis | Published on: CommentsComments (2)
BET

BET

Justin Timberlake was on the wrong end of a conversation about Jesse Williams’ impassioned 2016 BET Awards speech Sunday night. The “Can’t Stop The Feeling” singer tweeted he felt “inspired” by the Grey’s Anatomy star’s acceptance speech for the Humanitarian Award. Williams – who is an activist and executive producer of BET’s “Stay Woke” documentary – focused on racial and social justice issues along with cultural appropriation.

“This is for the real organizers all over the country,” Williams said June 26 at the Microsoft Theater in Los Angeles. “The activists, the civil rights attorneys, the struggling parents, the families, the teachers of students that are realizing that a system built to divide and impoverish and destroy us cannot stand if we do.”

He went on to call out the way Black lives are devalued in society yet Black culture is consumed effortlessly.

“We’ve been floating this country on credit for centuries, and we’re done watching and waiting while this invention called whiteness uses and abuses us. Burying Black people out of sight and out of mind while extracting our culture, our dollars, our entertainment like oil. Black gold,” he said. “Ghettoizing and demeaning our creations, then stealing them, gentrifying our genius and then trying us on like costumes before discarding our bodies like rinds of strange fruit. The thing is — just because we’re magic doesn’t mean we’re not real.”

Timberlake’s initial tweet was not what got him caught in a Twitter firestorm. It was his answer to a commenter’s question.

Ernest Owens is referring to Timberlake’s R&B tunes that date back to his debut solo album, Justified. The singer has frequently collaborated with hip-hop producer Timbaland to drum up songs like “SexyBack” and “Suit & Tie.” Owens is also commenting on Timberlake’s 2004 Super Bowl performance with Janet Jackson in which he tore off her top, exposing her right breast.

Other users asked similar questions.

https://twitter.com/chrystallll/status/747262891859021826?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

Timberlake only responded to Owens, though. He pushed the colorblind ideal, ignoring race entirely.

https://twitter.com/jtimberlake/status/747276674073395200

His response did not sit well with other users. Many condemned his views.

One user said Timberlake’s statement both dismissed and confirmed Williams’ speech at once.

Another mocked the ex-boy bander’s claim that “we are all the same.”

https://twitter.com/Felonious_munk/status/747283831753838592?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

User @firefire100 said the singer’s response dismissed the fact that cultural appropriation is a real thing.

Two hours after his initial response, the crooner followed-up by saying he felt “misunderstood.”

The tweet did not gain any sympathy.

He continued, reiterating why he was “inspired” by William’s speech: because he believes “we are all one… a human race.”

Timberlake later apologized to those who felt he was out of line.

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Give once Give monthly Support another way

Related Stories

Back to top