Michael Rapaport Is Quickly Reminded of His Own Insignificance After Questioning Janet Jackson’s Relevance

Many fans were sad and disappointed that performer Janet Jackson was not present at the Superbowl on Sunday (Feb. 4). However, they showed their love by creating a social-media campaign #JanetJacksonAppreciationDay making her a top-five trending topic on Twitter. The campaign was also a way to protest Justin Timberlake’s halftime performance after he ripped off Miss Jackson’s costume that displayed her nipple publicly in 2004. Although the tweets were to celebrate the singer’s influence on music, not everyone was here for “Janet Jackson Day”.

Especially comedian Michael Rapaport who took shots at Jackson on Twitter.

He then tweeted a picture of Janet with her now former husband Wissam Al Mana with the caption, “Queen of the 90s”, and wrote, “There’s no little girl under 18 who’s heard from Janet in 10 yrs”.

He also came for television personality Elgin Harris when the Hollywood hairdresser told Rapaport to put some respect on Jackson’s name.

Jackson fans weren’t too happy and quickly came to her defense, shredding Rapaport to pieces.

https://twitter.com/angrykittenpaws/status/960512485756456960

https://twitter.com/_NeMmY_/status/960343530630799360

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top