Some Eagles Already Planning to Skip Out on White House Visit Following Superbowl Win

Philadelphia Eagles star Malcolm Jenkins, along with teammates Torrey Smith and Chris Long are among the team’s notable players who say they don’t plan on visiting the White House following their victory over the New England Patriots at Super Bowl LVII on Sunday.

During an appearance on CNN Monday, Feb. 5, Jenkins made it clear that he’d be skipping out on the winning team’s tradition of stopping by the White House to celebrate.

“I don’t have a message for the president,” Jenkins said. “My message has been clear all year. I’m about creating positive changes in the communities I come from, whether it be Philadelphia, New Jersey, Ohio, Louisiana or this entire country.

“I want to see changes in our criminal justice system,” he added. “I want to see us push for economical and educational advancement in communities of color and low-income communities. And I want to see between our communities and our law enforcement be advanced.”

Smith also made his stance clear via Twitter Monday. Meanwhile, Long responded, “Are you kidding me?” when asked if he’d be accompanying his teammates to the White House.

https://twitter.com/TorreySmithWR/status/960561994922430464

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top