Dog Walking Company ‘Woof-Tang Clan’ Draws Ire of RZA, Wu-Tang Clan In Trademark Dispute

Woof-Tang Clan

Rapper RZA said Woof-Tang Clan’s name is a violation of the multiple trademarks already owned by the Wu-Tang Clan. (Images by Getty Images)

Wu-Tang Clan rapper and producer RZA has sued a Brooklyn-based dog-walking company, accusing the doggie-day service of ripping off the rap group’s name.

RZA, born Robert Diggs, kicked off the legal dogfight Nov. 17, after filing a trademark opposition suit against dog-walking service the Woof-Tang Clan, the New York Daily News reported. The company, owned and operated by Brooklyn man Marty Cuatchon, claims to walk “the illest dogs in New York City” while also offering pet-sitting services.

In court papers, Diggs argued that the Wu-Tang Clan’s name and logo were “unmistakably associated” with the Staten Island hip-hop group since their formation in 1993. He added that the Woof-Tang Clan’s attempt to trademark their name violated the many trademark registrations already owned by the group.

If ripping off Wu-Tang’s name wasn’t enough, Cuatchon also used his company’s website to sell t-shirts depicting pooches on classic hip-hip albums, one featuring a nod to late Wu Tang member ‘Ol Dirty Bastard’s debut album “Return to the 36 Chambers.” The merchandise has since been removed from the website.

Cuatchon spoke with the New York Daily News, saying he was aware of Digg’s trademark suit. “I am a fan,” he said. “We walk dogs. I thought it was a good idea.” The dog-walker declined to comment further until he could seek legal advice.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top