Jason Whitlock Has Twitter Rolling Its Collective Eyes Over Colin Kaepernick Stunt

Jason Whitlock Colin Kaepernick

Jason Whitlock just can’t stop chiding Colin Kaepernick. (FS1 Screenshot/Facebook)

Jason Whitlock, we know you’re not the biggest fan of Colin Kaepernick’s method of political activism.

But why did you have to go and do this?

The “Speak For Yourself” sports commentator happily tweeted Tuesday, Sept. 5, about having Kaepernick, a free-agent quarterback, in the studio. Except, the athlete who refused to stand for the national anthem last season wasn’t actually there. However, a bearded, afro-wearing man, who many thought was white, was.

https://twitter.com/WhitlockJason/status/905233739264868354


Jason Whitlock and Colin Kaepernick: A History

Jason Whitlock Praises LeBron James’ Refusal to Protest Anthem But This One Thing Ticks Him Off

Colin Kaepernick Fires Back at Michael Vick, Leading Ex-Falcon to Clarify His Remarks

Colin Kaepernick’s Parents ‘Truly Shocked by the Racist Hatred’ from Protest


Twitter users understandably took issue with over the portrayal.

https://twitter.com/Sports4TheSoul/status/905243763966189568

Fellow FS1 sportscaster Shannon Sharpe also had a problem with the skit. Looks like Whitlock could have to answer to the network head when Sharpe is through with him.

However, TMZ reported the fake Kaepernick is actually Kid, whose real name is Christopher Reid, from Kid n Play.

For all the controversy, Whitlock issued this snippy response.

https://twitter.com/WhitlockJason/status/905240561103192064

https://twitter.com/WhitlockJason/status/905416630024380416

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top