Jason Whitlock Praises LeBron James’ Refusal to Protest Anthem But This One Thing Ticks Him Off

On the Sept. 27 edition of FOX Sports One’s “Speak For Yourself,” commentator Jason Whitlock comments on LeBron James’ decision to stand for the national anthem.

The Cleveland Cavaliers star told press Monday that he supports San Francisco 49ers QB Colin Kaepernick’s protest. But he plans to stand during the national anthem in the upcoming NBA season. However, prior to that, James responded to the recent cases of police brutality rocking the nation. “You tell your kids that if you just comply … things will work itself out,” he said. “[But] you see these videos that continue to come out. It’s a scary a—- situation… I am not that confident that things [will turn out] well.”

In the segment above, Whitlock dismisses James’ potential fears for his son. Since the beginning of Kaepernick’s protest, Whitlock has become one of his most outspoken critics. He adds that James should worry about his son dying from texting or drinking and driving. However, police brutality rarely happens and should be at the bottom of his list of worries.

“… There are about 50-60 controversial police shootings a year,” Whitlock opines. “That does not add up to eight teenagers a day dying from drinking and driving. If you add in texting and driving … that is the real threat to your child … For a Black teenager, your chance of dying from the hands of another Black teenager is far more likely than the police taking out your child.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top