Trump Thinks Andrew Jackson, the Slaveowner with the ‘Big Heart,’ Could’ve Stopped the Civil War

President Donald Trump believes Andrew Jackson could have stopped the Civil War from happening had he not died in 1845 and questioned why it happened in the first place, leading to a chorus of historical answers from Twitter.

“I mean, had Andrew Jackson been a little later you wouldn’t have had the Civil War,” Trump said to the Washington Examiner. “He was a very tough person but he had a big heart. He was really angry that he saw with regard to the Civil War, he said, ‘There’s no reason for this.’

“People don’t realize, you know, the Civil War, if you think about it, why? People don’t ask that question, but why was there the Civil War? Why could that one not have been worked out?”

But by the time the Civil War erupted in 1861, there was no chance of a reconciliation.

“It was much, much harder to compromise as the Civil War broke out in 1861 because the nation was more squarely confronting [slavery],” Steve Inskeep, author of “Jacksonland,” told NPR Monday, May 1. “Northern votes had just elected Abraham Lincoln, a president from an allegedly radical new party that insisted that slavery was wrong and must be contained to the South. Southerners saw this as a threat to their property and tried to secede from the Union. … People did try, desperately, to “work out” that problem before the shooting started in 1861, but it was, in the end, an irreconcilable difference.”

Trump’s claim that Jackson had a big heart is also questionable as Jackson owned about 150 enslaved Africans.

“Although I hate chains, [I was] compelled to place two of them in irons, for safekeeping until an opportunity offers to sell or exchange them,” Jackson said of recapturing four of the Black people he enslaved in 1832.

Twitter also reacted to Trump’s statements.

https://twitter.com/MrDane1982/status/859087076612079616

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top