U.S. Diplomat Under Fire for Criticising Burundi for Exiting the ICC

icc-min

Burundians have been responding to the United States  envoy to the United Nations, for accusing their government of ‘attachment to impunity.’

Burundi’s Permanent Representative to the U.N., Albert Shingiro, had tweeted a picture of the foreign affairs minister presenting the country’s exit resolution from the International Criminal Court (ICC) to the Chief of staff of the UN secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.

Samantha Power, the U.S. ambassador to the U.N., responded to the tweet saying, ‘‘Burundian government makes official its deep attachment to impunity.”

Afterwards, the Burundian envoy hit back asking Power whether other countries that were not party to the ICC statutes could also be accused of promoting impunity. Several other people joined to lambaste the U.N. diplomat.

Burundi said on Wednesday that it had officially notified the U.N. of its decision to quit the ICC. They are the second African country behind South Africa to present their withdrawal notice to the U.N.

Gambia also hinted of plans to leave the Hague-based court, accusing it of being biased against Africans. Incidentally the current chief prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda, was a former justice minister of the Gambia.

Read more here.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top