Stay Connected
Atlanta Black Star/Africa
AfricaNewsWorld

AU Accuses ICC of Unfairly Targeting Africans, Urges Mass Withdrawal of Member States

Posted byBy Tracy | Published on: CommentsComments (0)

via hrw.org

The African Union has called for the mass withdrawal of member states from the International Criminal Court (ICC).

However, the resolution is nonbinding, with Nigeria and Senegal opposing a withdrawal.

South Africa and Burundi have already decided to withdraw, accusing the ICC of undermining their sovereignty and unfairly targeting Africans.

The ICC denies the allegation, insisting it is pursuing justice for victims of war crimes in Africa.

The AU made the decision on Tuesday, Jan. 31, following a divisive debate at its annual heads of state summit in Addis Ababa. Part of the resolution also said the AU would hold talks with the UN Security Council to push for the ICC to be reformed.

Sudan’s President Omar al-Bashir, who is wanted by the court on charges of genocide in Darfur, was at the summit. In 2015, a South African court criticized President Jacob Zuma’s government for failing to arrest Bashir when he attended an AU meeting in Johannesburg.

The government later announced that it was withdrawing from the ICC because it did not want to execute arrest warrants that would lead to “regime change.”

A total of 34 African states are signatories to the Rome Statute, which set up the ICC.

Read the full story here.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Give once Give monthly Support another way

Related Stories

Back to top