John Carlos Has Some Much Needed Words of Wisdom for Shaq and Other Kaepernick Critics

In a Sept. 29 interview with TMZ Sports, 1968 Olympian John Carlos skewers critics of San Francisco 49ers QB Colin Kaepernick’s national anthem protest.

For the last month, Kaepernick’s national anthem protest against police brutality has become a phenomenon propelling the backup QB into the national spotlight. Athletes around the NFL, in college, high school, the NBA and soccer have joined the protest. However, there have also been some detractors and critics. For instance, Shaquille O’Neal questioned Kaepernick’s timing in early September.

“What happened last year?” Shaq asked. “How come you didn’t decide to do this last year or the year before that or the year before that?”

But Carlos feels that Kaepernick does not deserve the scrutiny he is currently receiving.

“To Shaq and all the other guys that want to be the naysayers to what Kaepernick is doing,” Carlos starts, “all I can say to them is they better be careful on how they gonna come out … Which side of history they’re gonna come out in the future.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top