D.C. Police Officer Involved in #TerrenceSterling Shooting Turned On Body Cam After Incident

On Sept. 12, Washington D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser told media that the officer involved in a fatal shooting on Sunday did not have his body cam on.

According to FOX 5 D.C., Fort Washington, Maryland resident Terrence Sterling was riding his motorcycle erratically before officers pulled him over at 4:30 a.m.

Officers report that the 31-year-old struck a police vehicle before officers shot at him.

“Officers found the vehicle over here at the intersection of 3rd and M Streets, Northwest. It is about a block north of New York Avenue,” D.C. Police Assistant Chief Peter Newsham tells reporters. “They were able to stop the vehicle. The person who was riding the motorcycle attempted to flee and ended up striking the police car. At that point, shots were fired. The victim was taken to a local hospital where he was pronounced dead.”

In a Monday news conference, Bowser says she reached out to Sterling’s relatives.

She said only the aftermath of the incident was captured on camera — events leading up to the shooting were not.

FOX 5 reports that officers involved were required to turn on their body cams before any encounter begins. But they failed to do so.

The officers were placed on administrative leave for failing to adhere to protocol.

Sterling was an HVAC technician for a contracting firm for nearly a decade.

At this time, media is not aware if the family has retained an attorney.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top