President Obama to Baltimore Activist Kwame Rose: Describing Looting as a Political Act is ‘Counterproductive’

pjimage-5-2The city of Baltimore erupted into chaos last April following the funeral of Freddie Gray, a 25-year-old African-American man who died of severe spinal injuries sustained while in the custody of Baltimore police officers.

Tensions had been building for days after Gray’s death, with multiple standoffs between protesters and local police.

President Obama angered many social justice advocates when he referred to protesters as “criminals and thugs who tore up” the city during a White House press conference the next day on April 28.

“When individuals get crowbars and start prying open doors to loot, they’re not protesting,” he said at the time. “They’re not making a statement. They’re stealing.”

Critics accused the president of employing the same racial coded language often used by politicians and members of the media.

Empowerment Temple AME Church pastor Jamal Bryant, who delivered Gray’s eulogy, called Obama’s statements and similar ones made by Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake acts of “Black-on-Black crime,” in an interview with Fox’s Megan Kelly.

“They have committed Black-on-Black crime by using that word against people who look just like them. Absolutely,” Bryant said, per Mediaite.

Baltimore activist Kwame Rose, who was arrested during the maelstrom, was another of the president’s strongest attackers. He told NPR Morning Edition‘s Steve Inkeep that Obama spoke prematurely, without taking into account the stories behind each of the individuals captured on camera that day.

“I was one of the people he called a thug and criminal,” he said. “I was out there.”

Rose also slammed the notion of separating the frustrated protesters into two different groups: peaceful demonstrators and violent looters.

“I was there first hand [to] experience watching people run into the stores. I didn’t interpret it as violence. I interpreted it as a survival skill, a survival tactic,” he added.

When asked whether the president has been supportive of the cause, Rose was blunt.

“No, I don’t think the president has done anything for Black people.”

Inkeep gave the president a chance to respond to Rose in an interview published to the public radio site Wednesday morning. Obama said opponents need only look at his administration’s efforts for criminal justice reform.

“What I would also say is that if somebody is looting, they’re looting. And the notion that they’re making a political statement is not always the case,” he said, echoing his previous sentiments about the matter.

“Because these are businesses that oftentimes are owned by African-Americans. You have situations in which suddenly — friends of mine in Baltimore — their mothers who are elderly have to now travel across town to get their medicines because the local drug store got torn up.”

The president said making excuses for the destructive protesters was a “mistake” and suggested alternative methods of affecting change in the justice system.

“There are ways of bringing about social change that are powerful and that have the ability to pull the country together and maintain the moral high ground. And where I understand the frustrations, but they’re counterproductive and tearing.”

As for charges that he has become a part of the corrupt system, Obama said he’s an easy target, as holder of the nation’s high office.

“I think that you can always find folks who are going to feel as if change hasn’t happened fast enough,” he said. “If there’s a problem out there, then I’m the ultimate public official that people know. And if it hasn’t gotten fixed within a couple weeks, people are gonna say, ‘Why didn’t you fix it?’ “

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top