Akon Stands By Claim That Men Are ‘Natural Breeders’ but Adds How Women Can Run the World – Is He Right?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqkV9wKGH9c

After winning the 2016 Global Good Award at the BET Awards on Sunday, musician and humanitarian Akon spoke with Hollywood Today Live about his Lighting Africa Initiative that will bring electricity to 600 million people.

After discussing his humanitarian efforts, host Garcelle Beauvais asked the music mogul about a 2013 comment calling men “natural breeders” and whether he stands by this claim years later:

“Absolutely,” Akon answers.“Why is it that every woman in the world is going through the exact same problem with a man?”

“Just think about it. It’s not a coincidence, it’s just who we are. I always believed that if women took the time to understand men, you literally would run the world. The only reason why we’re more dominant is because we know more about women than women know about men.”

“Let’s think about it. [Men] are outnumbered 15 to 1,” he elaborates. “[Women] are clearly smarter than we are, and you execute a lot quicker and faster more than we do. So how is it that we run the world?”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top