M.I.A. to Headline London’s First Afropunk Festival; Fans Remind Promoters of Her Anti-Black Comments

M.I.A

Afropunk

Black music fans are upset after it was announced yesterday that UK rapper M.I.A. will headline Afropunk’s first festival in London. The rapper has previously been in hot water over her comments denouncing the Black Lives Matter movement.

The festival is Sept. 24 in Alexandria Palace, according to the website. Other acts scheduled to appear include SZA, Benjamin Booker, Gaika, Soulection, Purple Ferdinand and Ho99o9.

As is standard with most Afropunk shows around the world, once the sun goes down an AfterDark party begins. Concert-goers can take in a comedy show, celebrity DJ set, film screenings and art installations.

Tickets go on sale Friday, but many fans are wondering if it’s worth the price to see the 40-year-old rapper perform.

An editor’s letter published by Black Ballad Wednesday criticized M.I.A.’s involvement.

“The festival has built itself on a slogan of no sexism, no racism, no ableism, no homophobia, no fatphobia, no transphobia and no hatefulness,” writes Tobi Oredein. “That is the message that Afropunk parades, stands on and sells on t-shirts. Yet its main act spoke out of spite and hatefulness for a movement that is trying to save the lives of the festival’s target audience? No wonder black people are perplexed at her participation.”

Oredein is referring to the political musician’s comments to the Evening Standard in April which took aim at BLM, Beyoncé and Kendrick Lamar.

“It’s interesting that in America the problem you’re allowed to talk about is Black Lives Matter,” she told the website.  “It’s not a new thing to me — it’s what Lauryn Hill was saying in the 1990s or Public Enemy in the 1980s. Is Beyoncé or Kendrick Lamar going to say Muslim Lives Matter? Or Syrian Lives Matter? Or this kid in Pakistan matters? That’s a more interesting question. And you cannot ask it on a song that’s on Apple, you cannot ask it on an American TV program, you cannot create that tag on Twitter, Michelle Obama is not going to hump you back.”

Twitter brought more negative reactions.

One user threatened a boycott if M.I.A. performs.

https://twitter.com/JAYKASTHD/status/743386680950947840

Caleb said the thought of the star’s inclusion makes him uncomfortable.

Another user found the ordeal humorous given the controversial singer’s stance.

https://twitter.com/chidzhazenberry/status/743094853857333248

Lawrence Burney expressed his disappointment in the festival for their headlining act based on her negative comments on BLM.

Vikki questioned who was responsible for the decision.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top