Social, Economic Inequality Deeply Divided South Africa, Experts Say

Eusebius McKaiser Speaking at the eThekwini Municipality's social cohesion conference

Eusebius McKaiser Speaking at the eThekwini Municipality’s social cohesion conference

Speaking at the eThekwini Municipality’s social cohesion conference yesterday, political analysts Somadoda Fikeni and Eusebius McKaiser, and author advocate Christine Qunta, said social and economic inequalities left South Africa a deeply divided nation.

It was impossible, McKaiser said, to deal with racial equality without acknowledging that the inequalities of the past continued to exist today — and that Black South Africans still bore the brunt of these inequalities. He was skeptical about the concept of “non-racialism.”

Fikeni said the Rainbow Nation ideal punted post-1994 was one of the reasons South Africa is as divided as it is.

“We did not say we are striving to be a Rainbow Nation; we said that we are now a Rainbow Nation. It’s like going to a [football] match and saying that you’ve already won [so] there’s no need to perform,” he said.

Qunta said there was a huge economic and social discrepancy between Blacks and whites, and the tension caused by this power imbalance often burst into the open in the form of racist comments.

“Those who were previously oppressed are trying to unshackle themselves from the structural effects of such oppression and those who benefited from the oppression of the majority are trying to maintain the institutions that enabled their dominance. There is, in fact, a subterranean war raging which occasionally bursts out in the open.

“It is often thought social cohesion or the removal of racism is about individual changes of attitudes and minds. This is not the case. It is essentially a question of power. In turn, this determines the attitudes and actions of those who have it and those who don’t,” said Qunta.

Because of this, she did not feel true unity was possible, unless things changed.

Read more here.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top