Phylicia Rashad Avoids Trap to Criticize Bill Cosby in Recent Interview: ‘Let it Play Out’

247A224E00000578-2900407-image-a-1_1420634448468

Bill Cosby’s longtime TV wife, Phylicia Rashad, dodged topics pertaining to her former co-star’s sexual assault charges during a recent interview with The New York Times.

The co-star and friend whom Rashad called a”kind genius” during an exclusive interview with ABC News in 2015, now has an estimated 50 women who have accused him of rape and sexual assault.

Rashad, who played Cosby’s wife on TV for more than a decade, confessed last year to ABC News that she never saw any behavior that could lead her to believe the allegations against Cosby.

“What you’re seeing is the destruction of a legacy. And I think it’s orchestrated. I don’t know why or who’s doing it, but it’s the legacy. And it’s a legacy that is so important to the culture,” she said.  “This show represented America to the outside world. This was the American family. And now you’re seeing it being destroyed. Why?” Rashad asked during the 2015 interview.

Today, the iconic TV mom expressed to reporters at The Times something a little different during the interview that was initially supposed to discuss her appearance in the new Broadway stage play “Head of Passes.” As Rashad was asked to comment on specific allegations she said, “This is in litigation now, right? Then I’m not commenting on anything. Let that play itself out.”

Other cast members, such as Malcolm-Jamal Warner, who played Cosby’s son on The Cosby Show, told the Associated Press in October 2015 that he was concerned about the show’s legacy amid Cosby’s sexual assault allegations.

“I was not there. The Bill Cosby I know has been great to me and great for a lot of people. What he’s done for comedy and television has been legendary and history-making. What he’s done for the black community and education has been invaluable. That’s the Bill Cosby I know. I can’t speak on the other stuff,” Jamal-Warner said.

Since Cosby was recently granted partial motion in a defamation case due in part to the reaffirming nature of former co-stars like Rashad, many will have to wait and, as the star said, let the case “play itself out.”

“It’s difficult for me to watch this legacy be erased, as if [it] never happened… I think in the hearts and minds of people he is still held in high regard,” Rashad said.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top