8 Ways America’s Transportation System Has Discriminated Against the Black Community

GF-6-PC-11-cars-highway

Allocating Money That Disproportionately Benefits People with Cars

The transportation sector should be focusing on how it can help low-income Americans maintain a certain quality of life even if they can’t afford a car or choose not to drive one. Instead, however, these people seem to be void from decision-making processes as officials focus on projects that help car owners. A prime example is New Orleans. After the community was devastated by Hurricane Katrina in 2005, there were hardly any bus stops or existing bus routes throughout the area. While local officials have already launched new projects as far as roads are concerned, they have failed to bring more bus routes back to the neighborhoods and haven’t made repairs to the bus stops that are still in shambles from Hurricane Katrina’s aftermath, Slate reports.

runningarticle - DL

Cutting Public Transportation in Black Neighborhoods

Local officials have already demonstrated a serious reluctance to add public transportation, but predominantly Black communities across the nation are also learning how quickly governments will simply slash public transportation that could actually benefit the area. Communities like Oakland, California, and New Orleans are seeing officials simply cut back on buses and rail lines when these services become old and require repairs, as noted in the report “Race, Mass Transit and Inequality.” While some neighborhoods are seeing their mass transit services reduced, some have been left completely barren of any public transportation services.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top