With Over $1 Trillion in Spending Power, Black Community Needs to Shift Focus to Economics Over Politics

With so many prominent Black politicians finding success in the Republican Party and years of loyalty by the Black community to the Democratic Party, there’s still the ongoing debate about whether the Democrats have Black voters’ interests at heart. But one columnist says its time for Black voters to shift their focus altogether.

National Newspaper Publishers Association (NNPA) columnist George E. Curry explained that the Black community should focus more on economics than politics.

For years, Black voters have been looking for political candidates who would address the problems that have long plagued Blacks across the nation.

From disadvantages in education to a flawed justice system, it seems like the issues dear to the Black community don’t come to the forefront of either party’s political agendas and decades of hoping for change have resulted in disappointment.

“Even when we have given it our best, politics have never delivered the expected results,” Curry wrote on DistrictChronicles.com. “I am old enough to remember how exuberant we were with the election of the first wave of Black big city mayors: Carl Stokes in Cleveland, Richard Hatcher in Gary, Indiana, Ken Gibson in Newark and later, Tom Bradley in Los Angeles, Andrew Young in Atlanta and David Dinkins in New York…In January we will have not one, but two Blacks in the U.S. Senate (Cory Booker and Tim Scott), the largest African-American contingent ever in the upper chamber.”

But that, Curry explains, is not what will bring about real change.

Instead of waiting for politicians to deliver solutions, Curry says Blacks should focus on a sector where they already have the upper hand—economics.

Black people have extraordinary spending power as the community is on the verge of spending $1.3 trillion every year, according to a Nielsen study.

“It’s time to shift our attention to economic development and empowerment,” he wrote. “I am not saying we should abandon politics—we shouldn’t—but it should no longer be our primary focus.”

Curry acknowledges that there have been some improvements in recent years, such as a boost in employment, but the impact of that economic boost was barely felt in the Black community.

African-Americans still have disproportionately higher unemployment rates than any other demographic group.

This is where focusing on the battle of economics can prove truly effective.

Studies reveal that many company CEOs will hire the demographic that seems “familiar” to them, although this is often an unconscious decision.

By empowering Black business owners, communities can pave a road to more Black employees and drastically cut down on unemployment rates.

This could also encourage the growth and expansion of other Black-owned businesses.

Increasing wealth in the Black community will allow more people of color to invest in education, afford health care and boost homeownership, Curry says.

These are the types of responses that could give African-Americans the power to make major changes in their own communities and eventually across the nation.

 

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top