Bishop T.D. Jakes Vows Legal Action Against Young Jeezy, Kendrick Lamar for ‘Holy Ghost’ Sample

Bishop T.D. Jakes, the powerful televangelist behind The Potter’s House in Dallas, has vowed to sue rappers Young Jeezy and Kendrick Lamar for sampling a part of one of his sermons in the Holy Ghost remix.

Unfortunately for Jakes, legal experts don’t believe the lawsuit will hold its own in court.

Jakes took to Facebook to announce that he will be taking legal action against the hip-hop stars as he revealed he did not give the rappers consent to use any portion of his Don’t Let Chatter Stop You speech that he delivered back in 2013.

“The Holy Ghost remix by Jeezy featuring Kendrick Lamar was produced without the knowledge or consent of T.D. Jakes, TDJ Enterprises, Dexterity Music or its associated companies,” the Facebook post explained. “We are taking the necessary legal actions to stop the unauthorized use of T.D. Jakes’ intellectual property.”

The sampled clip features roughly 20 seconds of Jakes’ speech in the very beginning of the track.

“I’m under attack, but I’m still on fire,” Jakes’ powerful voice can be heard saying as a crowd cheers. “I’ve got some chatter, but I’m still on fire. I’ve got some threat, but I’m still on fire. I got some liabilities, but I’m still on fire. It’s not amazing that I’m on fire. I’ve been to hell and back, but I’m still on fire.”

The 57-year-old Grammy-winning evangelical leader certainly doesn’t preach a message that would coincide with some of Jeezy’s lyrics, which could be behind the immediate decision to take legal action.

While no reps for Jakes, Jeezy or Kendrick have commented publicly about the lawsuit, legal experts are not so sure that Jakes has a strong case here.

“This sounds like a strong fair use case,” Los Angeles lawyer Jonathan Kirsch told the Daily News.

According to Kirsch, the 1994 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in favor of the Miami rap group 2 Live Crew could be enough to let Jeezy and Kendrick off the hook.

In that ruling, the judge decided that the group’s sampling of singer Roy Orbison’s Oh, Pretty Woman was fair use for parody purposes.

T.D. Jakes sues Kendrick Lamar Young Jeezy Since certain forms of commentary are also protected by fair use, it seems the hip-hop stars may not be in too much trouble after all.

“Generally speaking, it is ‘fair use,’ in the context of a song, to copy elements of someone else’s work in order to make a point that amounts to commentary,” Kirsch added. “The notion of taking a cultural artifact, like a sermon, and using a small portion to make a comment on the role of religion in peoples’ consciousness is very similar.”

This isn’t the first time a hip-hop star was threatened by legal action for sampling someone’s work.

Former child star Ricky Spicer sued Kanye West, who has become known for his frequent use of samples, after West sampled his voice on Bound 2.

West has faced several other lawsuits throughout his career for his use of samples.

More recently, rapper Drake was sued over the sample he used on Pound Cake/Paris Morton Music 2.

In the beginning of the track, late jazz singer Jimmy Smith can be heard saying, “Only real music is gonna last. All that other bulls**t is here today and gone tomorrow.”

The monologue continues on the track for about 35 seconds.

 

 

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top