The Takeover? Beats Music Officially Launching Streaming Service

beats-musicBeats Electronics, the fashion headphone behemoth led by Jimmy Iovine and Dr. Dre, has officially announced its plans to launch a music streaming service in the U.S. on Jan. 21. Dubbed Beats Music, the $10-per-month subscription service will enter an already crowded field. Major brands like Apple, Google and Sony, each offer an on-demand music service, and Internet startup Spotify, despite its small size, attracts 6 million paying listeners worldwide, and several times that with its free ad-supported option. Beats has chosen to forgo the freemium business model altogether. It will offer just a single monthly subscription plan, although there will be a free trial period.

The move by Beats into the streaming market has been long anticipated. In 2012, Beats Electronics bought the music subscription service Mog, with executives stating their intention to build an “end-to-end” music service. From a features standpoint, Beats Music doesn’t appear to offer much that’s new. Users who know exactly what they want to hear can choose from the same 20 million song catalog that competing services have licensed from the major record labels. You can download tracks for offline listening, and like other paid subscription offerings, there are no ads to interrupt the music. The Beats Music mobile app will work with iOS, Android and Windows Phone devices.

Beats’ path to success relies, not so much on peeling off customers from existing services with the lure of better features, as much as growing the entire streaming market by a significant margin. With music download sales declining for the first time since the launch of iTunes, the music industry has ample motivation to see streaming service expand beyond its tech-savvy, largely male demographic. And the Beats Music paid-only model is thought to mean higher royalties for the record companies, though no one is divulging licensing terms. Targeting a mainstream audience is an obvious move. The key question is whether that audience is willing to pay $10 a month. Of course, back in 2008, no one thought people would pay $200 for headphones to plug into their phones.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top