Colts Kicker Pat McAfee Rocks Broncos Trindon Holliday, Triggers Random Drug Test

Broncos quarterback Peyton Manning was the star of the game, but it was a hit from Indianapolis Colts punter Pat McAfee on Trindon Holliday that stole the show.

Holliday was completely rocked by McAfee during the last few minutes of the first quarter while he was returning a 56-yard kickoff return. The punter’s hit was so hard that it raised some eyebrows, instantly prompting the league to issue McAfee a random performance enhancing drug test. Check out the hit in the gif below.

McAffee2 McAfee

 

McAfee joked on Twitter, showing his random drug test letter from the league:

“Guys… Make one random tackle… And end up on a “Random” steroid test.. Must be my bod #UpperBodyOfAnAdolescent pic.twitter.com/s9B7LrS89Y— Pat McAfee (@PatMcAfeeShow) October 21, 2013.”

McAfee was never flagged for the hit and Pro Football Talk explained why:

“The hit by Pat McAfee on Trindon Holliday was helmet to helmet but not illegal. McAfee didn’t use the top of his helmet.— ProFootballTalk (@ProFootballTalk) October 21, 2013.”

 

The Colts defeated Denver 39-33, giving the Broncos their first loss of the season.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top