US Open: Serena Williams Defeats Sloane Stephens

Serena Williams, who lost to Sloane Stephens earlier this year, managed to top the young American 6-4, 6-1 in the U.S. Open quarterfinals in New York on Sunday.

“She’s definitely a good player, so it felt like something bigger, but I just had to stay focused for the moment,” Williams said in her courtside interview.

After a 4-4 tie in the first set, Williams took control of the match. The 16-time Grand Slam champion won eight of the last nine games.

“The whole time, I just tried to do what I wanted,” Williams said. “Stay calm, stay relaxed, stay composed.”

Stephens started out well, but gained six unforced errors when she served at 4-5, ultimately finishing the match with 29 unforced errors.

“Obviously, she’s No. 1 in the world for a reason,” Stephens said. “I thought she played really well herself. Obviously, it didn’t go how I wanted. The second set got away from me a little bit. All in all, I thought I competed well and played well. That’s all you can do, really.”

Next up for Williams is 18th-seeded Carla Suarez Navarro, who beat eighth-seeded Angelique Kerber 4-6, 6-3, 7-6 (3) in the quarterfinals.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top