Arab Allies Refuse to Support US Attack Against Syria

As the Western drum beats war threats against Syria, the Obama administration is having difficulty convincing its Arab allies to publicly support military intervention.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Arab leaders said Tuesday that Syria had used chemical weapons against its population, while Western governments discussed military responses to the attacks, bolstering the case for U.S. military strikes against the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

The Arab League demanded an international response to what it called the “heinous crime” of last week’s alleged chemical attack near Damascus that activists and rebels said left more than 1,000 Syrians dead. But the major Arab allies of the U.S. have stopped short of offering public support for a strike without international backing, reflecting broad unease in the region about another Western military intervention, the Wall Street Journal reports.

US Finds Support Among Western European Allies

According to The New York Times, the Obama administration has robust European backing and more muted Arab support for a strike on Syria. The position of the Arab League and the unlikelihood of securing authorization from the United Nations Security Council complicate the legal and diplomatic case for the White House.

The White House said Tuesday that there was “no doubt” that Assad’s government was responsible for the chemical weapons attack — an assessment shared by Britain, France and other allies — but it has yet to make clear if it has any intelligence directly linking Assad to the attack. The administration said it planned to provide intelligence on the attack later this week, the Times reported.

Obama sought to shore up international support for military action, telephoning Prime Minister David Cameron of Britain. Administration officials said they did not regard the lack of an imprimatur from the Security Council or the Arab League as insurmountable hurdles, given the carnage last week, the report said.

A Warning From Russia

A Western military attack on Syria would only create more problems in the region, lead to more bloodshed and  could result in the same sort of  “catastrophe” as previous  interventions in Iraq and Libya, said Sergei Lavrov, Russia’s foreign minister, on Monday, according to the Washington Post.

“Hysteria is growing, and confrontation is incited,” Lavrov said, in what he portrayed as an emergency news conference. He said the U.S. and its European allies have condemned Assad regime without any evidence that it actually used chemical weapons in an attack in the Damascus suburbs on Wednesday, the Post reported.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top