Stay Connected
Atlanta Black Star/Politics/National
NationalNewsPolitics

Obama Prepares for Possible Military Strike Against Syria

Posted byBy Nick Chiles | Published on: | Updated on August 28, 2013 CommentsComments (1)

The Obama administration believes it has definitive proof that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad deployed mass gassing of Syrian civilians last week, killing more than 300 people, leading the administration to prepare to make a military strike against Assad.

Though White House spokesman Jay Carney was reluctant to provide details, officials say the White House has begun to notify Congressional leaders of a possible strike. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel told the BBC on Tuesday that the Pentagon has complied with President Obama’s request for options for all contingencies.

“He has seen them, we are prepared,” Hagel said. “We have moved assets in place to be able to fulfill and comply with whatever option the president wishes to take. We are ready to go.”

The administration also was working to assemble allied backing and obtain assent from the Arab League that the Syrian government was responsible for the alleged chemical weapons attack that killed hundreds near Damascus last week. The influential League called for those behind the attack to be brought to international justice at an emergency meeting today in Cairo—though the 22 members stopped well short of endorsing outside military action.However, they urged the U.N. Security Council to agree on “deterrent” measures.
Meanwhile, Syria has vociferously denied responsibility for the attack and its foreign minister, Walid al-Moualem, said Syria’s military would defend the country against any foreign intervention.“We all hear the drums of war around us,” Moualem said Tuesday. “If they want to attack Syria, I think that using the lie of chemical weapons is fake and not accurate, and I challenge them to show evidence.”He added that if the West believes a military strike will change the balance of power in Syria, which has been embroiled in a bloody civil war for more than two years, that is “delusional and not at all possible.”

White House press secretary Jay Carney said that when Obama “has made a decision and has an announcement to make, he’ll make it.”

Carney said the U.S. and many other nations are convinced that the Assad government was responsible for the attack.

Carney said the only remaining decision for the president is “what is the appropriate response to this clear violation of international norms?”

What might an attack look like? U.S. officials said it would be of limited scope and duration, using “stand-off” weapons such as sea-launched cruise missiles or long-range bombers. They would be designed as much to send a message of resolve and warning, as to seriously damage the regime.

Possible targets under consideration are Syrian air force bases, aircraft, and command and control facilities. Chemical weapons storage areas are unlikely because of their number and the manner in which they disperse—which might lead to civilian collateral damage.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Give once Give monthly Support another way

Related Stories

Back to top