Report: Alex Rodriguez Leaked Names of Fellow Players in Doping Scandal

New York Yankees third baseman Alex Rodriguez’s and his assosicates reportedly leaked to the media the names of his fellow players, Francisco Cervelli and Milwaukee Brewers outfielder Ryan Braun, linking them to the Biogenesis scandal.

According to a report by “60 Minutes,” members of Rodriguez’s team obtained information that contained Braun and Cervelli’s names and sent them to Yahoo! Sports.

Yahoo! Sports was the first media outlet to report Braun and Cervelli’s involvement with Biogenesis.

Rodriguez’s attorney, David Cornwell, released a statement  about the allegations on Friday, denying that A-Rod has anything to do with the claims.

“These allegations are untrue and are another attempt to harm Alex, this time by driving a wedge between him and other players in the league,” Cornwell said. “While Alex focuses on baseball and repeatedly states that he is going to respect the appeal process, the drumbeat of false allegations continues. These improper and viciously false leaks will not alter the fact that MLB exceeded its authority under the JDA [Joint Drug Agreement] and the 211 game [suspension] will not stand.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top