White House, GOP Battle Over Implementation and Perception of Obamacare

With the full implementation of Obamacare looming on the horizon, the White House and Republicans are engaged in an epic public relations battle over the perception of the health law. 

“It’s a very important battle and both sides are trying to come out on top,” said Julian Zelizer, a Princeton University historian and CNN contributor. “The first stage was about whether this passes or not. … Now the battle is over implementing it and there are all sorts of ways Republicans are trying to cause problems.”

It’s not clear which side is winning the PR battle. The most recent CNN poll found that only 43 percent of the public “supports the health care law.”  But upon closer inspection, the results indicated that 16 percent of Americans, about a third of those who “oppose the health care law,” do so because they felt it doesn’t go far enough. That means 59 percent of the public either supports the law or thinks it should be even more liberal.

The White House got a huge boost from California, which released the amount it would charge for premiums through the state’s exchanges, as required by the Affordable Care Act. The premiums were as much as half the price of what was initially expected, with an average of $304  monthly for the cheapest silver-level plan and the most basic plans coming in at as low as $700 a year.

That was devastating news for Republicans hoping the plans would be prohibitively expensive and lead to public outrage. It was also bad news for the many Republican-led states — such as most of the South —who are refusing to participate in even the process of setting up the exchanges.

If states like California can create exchanges with cheap but effective plans, it will put enormous pressure on those states that are trying to resist participating.

In effect, the Republican opposition seems to consist of doing everything possible to make the program fail—a plan that easily could backfire on them if Obamacare is widely embraced by the public.

As Aaron Carroll pointed out on CNN.com, this refusal to implement major legislation is a new phenomenon.

“This is a relatively new thing when it comes to major legislation,” he writes. “Past laws on this scale, including the Children’s Health Insurance Program, Medicare, and Social Security were amended and changed years and even months after being passed.

“That’s incredibly unlikely to happen with respect to Obamacare…If, a year from now, it appears that exchanges are working out in states that embraced them, and that the Medicaid expansion is succeeding in states that allowed it, then it may turn out that refusing to bend may have instead caused the opposition to break.”

Republicans are making a bet that the collapse of Obamacare will be a big boon to the party next year during the 2014 midterm elections. But the success of Obamacare would be a huge lift to the Democrats and Obama’s legacy.

“We’ve got to make sure everybody has good health in this country,” Obama said at Morehouse College’s commencement ceremonies recently. “It’s not just good for you, it’s good for this country. So you’re going to have to spread the word to your fellow young people.”

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top