Nanny Drags Diddy Into Second Lawsuit Against Kim Porter

Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs has mo money, mo problems. The hip hop mogul was pulled into a lawsuit brought on by his ex-girlfriend and mother to three of his children’s nanny. Kim Porter is already facing one lawsuit from her former nanny who accused her of smoking weed and other illegal drugs around her children.

According to TMZ,

Nanny #2 Amanda Jansen has filed a lawsuit in L.A. County Superior Court, claiming Porter hired her in 2011 to care for Diddy’s children … but her job quickly turned into that of a full-service round-the-clock housekeeper.

In addition to caring for the kids, Jansen claims she worked well over 100 hours a week doing all sorts of chores — without ever being given a proper break.

Jansen — who claims she was hired as live-in help — also claims she was never given a room with a working lock … had no furniture other than a bed and a computer desk … and was forced to live out of a suitcase.

In the suit, Jansen claims she eventually complained about her crazy schedule — and was fired as a result. Now, she’s suing for overtime, wrongful termination, and more. Sources tell us she’s looking for a 6-figure payout.

So why is Diddy involved? Jansen claims she was paid directly by Diddy’s company, Bad Boy Worldwide Entertainment … and therefore, the company should be on the hook.

Sounds like it’s time for an internal investigation!

 

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top