Americans Don’t Want Obama to Intervene in Israel Peace Process

President Obama leaves for the Middle East on Wednesday, and his agenda will be full of intractable crises in the region that impacts Israel but does not have much of a direct influence on America. Still, as the world’s cop, the president of the United States is asked to intercede to in the name of peace.

But as President Obama meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and others who want the U.S. to play a bigger role in the regional conflicts, the president might want to pay close attention to a new poll conducted by ABC News/Washington Post. In it, seven in 10 Americans said they would prefer the U.S. stay out of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and let them work it out themselves, which is 15 points higher than the percentage who said the same thing the last time the question was asked 11 years ago.

Among those polled, 55 percent were more sympathetic to Israel, while just nine percent sided with the Palestinian Authority. The rest were undecided or didn’t have a preference.

Middle East experts expect Israel to use the trip to move Obama on two fronts: persuading the U.S. to carry out air strikes on Syria if there is evidence that Syrian missiles are to be handed over to Israel enemy Hezbollah in Lebanon; lower the threshold for taking military action against Iran to stop its development of nuclear weapons, an issue that has caused conflict between Obama and Netanyahu over the last couple of years. For its part, the U.S. will be trying to push Israel into recommitting itself to a peace process with the Palestinians.

No one expects either side to be successful in its wishes.

On the question of Syria, Obama has indicated the U.S. would intervene militarily only to stop Syrian President Bashar al-Assad regime from using its chemical or biological weapons or transferring them to extremist groups. Missiles being sent to Hezbollah to be hidden in Lebanon is a crucial issue for the Israelis. By some estimates, there are up to 60,000 missiles hidden in southern Lebanese villages.

“These missiles are not just a problem for Israel,” a senior Israeli official told the Guardian. “They include [anti-ship] missiles, and who has the biggest navy in the Mediterranean?” – a reference to the U.S.

But while much of the focus of Obama’s trip centers on his relationship with the Israelis, Palestinians don’t have much hope that Obama will pressure Israel to make any concessions that will benefit them—and they feel abandoned after the hope that accompanied Obama’s election in 2008.

“Obama is coming for Israel, not for us,” Mohammed Albouz, a 55-year-old Palestinian farmer, told the Guardian. “Obama will come and go as his predecessors did, without doing anything.”

Large posters of Obama that hung in Ramallah on the West bank last week were quickly defaced, while a small group of activists called “The Campaign for Dignity” plans on releasing black balloons into the air in a sign of mourning when Obama arrives.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top