Last week, Hollywood Reporter film critic Todd McCarthy suggested seven filmmakers to take up the reins on the project, should Spielberg opt out of directing it himself.
The names McCarthy suggested weren’t in and of themselves bad ideas: David Fincher, Paul Thomas Anderson, Martin Scorsese, Kathryn Bigelow, Ridley Scott, Christopher Nolan and Peter Weir. No one is going to argue that every one of them is talented and up to the challenge. But there was a wishful quality to the list, not all that reasonable, really.
Not only that, they are disparate voices that probably wouldn’t work in a single boat. A miniseries like this, if farmed out to talent and not placed on one filmmaker’s shoulders, would obviously need to find an organic rhythm across a spectrum of voices.
Of the list, I thought only Weir seemed plausible and suitable. No one wants to end up mimicking Kubrick here, but it would be nice if the filmmaker’s sensibilities were reflected. Nolan and Anderson have had sometimes dubious parallels drawn to the filmmaker, but on the whole, this A-list just feels like something we’d LIKE to see, but surely won’t.
But it’s a great jumping off point, so I reached out to HitFix’s Greg Ellwood and Guy Lodge to help cook up an alternative list. Additionally, given that we’re exploring a project set for TV, I asked Dan Fienberg for his suggestions on that front as well. The result is a collective of 20 names that we’d like to submit for consideration, again, if indeed Spielberg would prefer to produce while handing the directorial duties off to others.
Some names that didn’t make the list but were mulled over include Darren Aronofsky, Susanne Bier, Sofia Coppola, Walter Hill and James Marsh. I’d personally stump for Weir and maybe Anderson from McCarthy’s list, but there’s also one other filmmaker he mentioned “whose work is just as exacting and chilly as Kubrick’s and who is probably his intellectual equal: Michael Haneke.” I’d be on board for that, too.
Read more: HitFlix