Fox News Commentator Juan Williams Blames Plagiarism on Assistant

Washington pundit Juan Williams stepped into a mini-scandal this week after Salon reported that he plagiarized a report on immigration reform produced by the Center for American Progress, a mistake Williams blamed on an assistant.

Williams, who dishes most of his punditry on Fox News, revealed in his admission how much some of the top columnists depend on researchers to produce their pieces. A similar problem  last year hit TV host Fareed Zakaria, who said he had unintentionally plagiarized when he mistakenly mixed up different notes from different sources.

Williams’ error in a column for The Hill was first reported on Salon by Alex Seitz-Wald.

“I was writing a column about the immigration debate and had my researcher look around to see what data existed to pump up this argument and he sent back what I thought were his words and summaries of the data,” Williams told Seitz-Wald. “I had never seen the CAP report myself, so I didn’t know that the young man had in fact not summarized the data, but had taken some of the language from the CAP report.”

The Hill revised the Williams column after CAP brought the similarities to the attention of  its editor, Hugo Gordon, including a note referring to the “previously-omitted attribution to the Center for American Progress.”

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top